Weekly Briefing: Farage's rare achievement
Plus: the truth about immigration, how to spot a bot and the red tape that means gardens aren't green
My Pick of the Week goes to Gawain Towler. Nigel Farage’s re-election on Friday as Clacton’s MP was hardly a surprise, but many analysts have pointed out that Farage’s vote share was at the low end of expectations and suggested it was a disappointing night for Reform UK. Towler looks instead at the raw vote numbers – and argues that Farage actually managed something quite rare and remarkable. You can read his argument in full below.
We also featured CPS Research Director Karl Williams this week, responding to an essay by Sam Freedman that called the recent spike in migration known as the ‘Boriswave’ a myth. While the economic consequences may be heavily disputed, the scale and speed of change were very real.
In Nottingham for example, the population rose by 2,943 from mid-2020 to mid-2025 but net international migration of 36,416 people accounted for 1,237% of the net population increase, more than offsetting deaths and internal migration. There are another 90 local authorities in England and Wales with significant population growth where net international migration accounted for at least 100% of the increase over this period, including Norwich (607%), Gwynedd (239%), Eastbourne (196%) and Worcester (186%).
Elsewhere, Alys Denby gave an editor’s guide to spotting AI writing. John Penrose argued that rather than fudging the fiscal rules, Andy Burnham should be honest about the state of Britain’s finances and commit to releasing a national balance sheet every year. Bruce Buckland revealed how housebuilding is being held back by perverse biodiversity rules where private gardens don’t count. Limor Simhony Philpott analysed the ecosystem behind Britain’s rising tide of antisemitism, and as self-driving taxis hit the streets of the capital, James Price made the case that driverless cars can save Britain.
On The Capitalist this week, Richard Hanania and I discussed his new book ‘Kakistocracy’, why the Tech Right got swallowed by MAGA and how populism goes wrong. Listen here.
Marc Sidwell
Editor, CapX
Farage wins Clacton – with more votes
Gawain Towler
At a few minutes past six on Friday morning, in a leisure centre on the Essex coast, the returning officer reached the bottom of a ballot paper roughly a metre long and announced a number that deserves more attention than it is likely to receive. Nigel Farage, 22,239 votes.
The commentary had settled into its groove long before the count. A fake by-election, a coronation, a man beating a bin. Kemi Badenoch declined to contest what she called Farage’s ‘fake by-election’, Labour and the Liberal Democrats stayed away, and the field was left to the comedian Jonathan Harvey (aka Count Binface), to Laurence Fox, to three separate Monster Raving Loony candidates and to a gentleman calling himself Woke Trump Carrzee. There were 34 candidates in all, a record, beating the 26 who stood against David Davis when he engineered his own by-election at Haltemprice and Howden in 2008. It took the returning officer seven minutes merely to read the thing.
So what could such a pantomime possibly tell us? More than the sniggering allows. Buried beneath the jokes is a result of a kind Britain has produced perhaps twice since the War.
Once a by-election becomes a question of legitimacy rather than representation, voters grow more determined to be heard, not less
At the general election in July 2024, with every major party on the ballot, 21,225 people voted for Farage in Clacton. On Thursday, at an August by-election whose outcome was never in doubt, on a turnout fourteen points lower, 22,239 did. His share of the vote tells us little, since anyone can produce a spectacular percentage when the opposition declines to turn up. His actual vote is another matter. Twenty-two thousand two hundred and thirty-nine people walked to a polling station in the middle of August to vote for a man who could not lose.
Incumbents do not do this. By-election turnout has not exceeded the corresponding general election turnout since Greenwich in 1987, and a defending candidate increasing his raw poll is rarer still. Douglas Carswell could not manage it here in 2014, in the defining by-election of the UKIP years. His 21,113 votes made him UKIP’s first elected MP, and they were still fewer than the 22,867 he had polled as a Conservative in 2010. Davis’s vote at Haltemprice fell sharply. The pundits reaching for the 2014 comparison have it the wrong way round.
The company Farage has just joined is small and instructive. Winchester, November 1997. Mark Oaten had won the seat in May by two votes, a Conservative petition overturned the result and the electorate was required to vote again in the autumn. Turnout fell 10 points and Oaten’s vote rose from 26,100 to 37,006, a majority of two becoming a majority of 21,556. The other case is Fermanagh and South Tyrone in 1981, where Bobby Sands polled 30,492 on an 87% turnout and Owen Carron, five months later, exceeded even that. While the atmosphere there was grief and national conflict rather than electoral theatre, the lesson is the same. Make a by-election a test of a candidate’s legitimacy, and voters grow more determined to be heard, not less.
Opponents will focus on Farage’s 63% share of the vote, and argue it is at the lower end of expectations. But vote share means little when the serious opposition has vacated the field. The raw vote is far harder to explain away. Some 35,111 valid votes were cast, against roughly 46,000 at the general election, and the whole of that contraction, and then some, came out of the anti-Farage column, which fell from about 24,700 to 12,872. Farage kept 105% of his general election vote while the contest shrank to three quarters of its previous size.
The abstaining parties meant to demonstrate that the whole exercise was beneath serious politics. What they actually did was strip out the noise. Their absence, novelty candidates aside, left one man who was bound to win, and the people still motivated enough to vote for him just to prove a point. That does not tell us what Farage would poll against a full field. It tells us something his opponents would be unwise to ignore: that offered the easiest imaginable excuse to stay on the beach, more than 22,000 of his voters turned up regardless.
The rest of the ballot paper is a core sample of contemporary English politics. Rejoin EU finished third on 492 votes, 1.4%, in one of the heaviest Leave constituencies in the country. Handed a free run at any residual continental enthusiasm, with no Labour or Liberal Democrat candidate in the way, the cause of re-entry was beaten 19 to one by a man dressed as a bin.
Meanwhile Laurence Fox’s Reclaim managed 347, behind two unknown independents. The assorted standard-bearers of the online harder right scraped barely 600 votes between them in perhaps the most favourable seat in England. Calling Farage a sell-out might generate attention on X, but this electorate had little time for it.
In all, 32 of the 34 candidates lost their deposits. The bin did not. Jonathan Harvey’s 9,455 is the best result a satirical candidate has ever recorded at Westminster. But the protest vote has to go somewhere, and when the big parties funk the fight it will settle on whatever is standing, up to and including a bin.
There was a quieter dividend for Reform UK. For six weeks Clacton served as a live electoral exercise of the sort parties would pay handsomely to buy. Thousands of activists worked the party’s election software under battle conditions, running canvass returns, manning the telling and practising getting supporters to a polling station. The parties that stayed away learned nothing, and armies that skip manoeuvres discover what they’ve missed when the shooting starts. Reform, meanwhile, now holds a more detailed map of its support in Clacton, and of its absences, than any party holds anywhere in the country. In the long run that may be worth more than the 63%.
The Standards Commissioner has wasted no time in reopening his investigation into Farage’s donations, and will report in due course. If the committee recommends a suspension of more than 10 sitting days, a recall petition will follow – and Binface has more than enough voters to trigger another by-election. Badenoch has already promised that next time the ‘grown-up’ parties will graciously attend. Perhaps they will. But what then? Every modern instance of the political class requiring a constituency to vote again has ended with the electorate returning the same verdict more loudly. Clacton has just signalled its willingness to follow suit.
So will there be another by-election? Perhaps. Parliament’s machinery grinds on and the committee corridor has its own micro-climate. But the voters’ answer won’t change. If the parties that boycotted this contest have any sense, they will leave well enough alone.
And if you want more…
– A National Care Service would be a disaster (Eamonn Butler)
– Reversing Brexit by stealth is a fantasy (Julian Jessop)
– Britain’s defence kit has a China problem (Eliot Wilson)
Can we make CapX better?
Or reply to this email to let us know your thoughts.
We’ll be back on Monday.






Doesn’t much matter whether immigrants are legal or illegal. Just give them jobs, ensure they pay taxes and treat them like everyone else. There’s no evidence that they are any more criminal than their resident age cohort, although reliable analysis is not available.
Remember that 95% of small-boat arrivals since 2018 have claimed asylum, and substantial numbers have subsequently been granted protection. They are illegal ONLY because the immigration laws introduced by May sucked up to the electoral threat posed by Farage’s hate mongering.
Immigrants, legal or illegal aren’t the problem, we are - you and me. If we were our fathers, we’d probably be dead.
I recall from the days when I advised Sally (Baroness) Greengross at Age Concern that between 80 and 85 an individual burns much cost of welfare as between birth and 80 - I think that’s right.
I used sporadically to write about pensions for The Times and Telegraph. The following figures have been produced by the increasingly indispensable ChatGPT but they chime with my rusty recollection.
When the Old Age Pensions Act was introduced in1908 there were 40.6 million people in Great Britain and only about 475,000 pension recipients on average during 1909 — approximately 85 people in the population for every pensioner.
Today there are about 2.6 workers for every pensioner.
34.5m ÷ 13.2m =2.614
That’s 85 plays call it 3.
Same is more or less true for income-tax payers per state pensioner:
39m ÷ 13.2m = about 3.0 income-tax payers for every pensioner.
Thatcher’s theft of council housing is another huge problem. It’s one reason why young people are continuing to live at home and aren’t having children-education cost is another.
Around 1908, women in England and Wales were having roughly 3.5–4 children on average.
Today, the figure is only about 1.39 children per woman in England and Wales, according to the ONS’s provisional figure for 2025 — the latest available. It was 1.41 in 2024.
That’s fewer workers for pensions like me to sponge off.
Restore council housing. NHS and welfare pays for itself from increased tax revenue. Farmers, social care, NHS benefit. Free education.
It all adds up to increased taxes, which I welcome. I’m persuaded that there’s a loose but convincing correlation between high tax paying and happier societies.
Kind of figures because high tax revenues are likely to result in good services, think of it as a subscription service from which tax payers receive good value.
So, higher taxes or euthanasia. Take your pick.
Julian Jessop highlights Nick Boles's suggestion that the UK (together with the EU ? ) join in defence agreements "with others that share democratic values". CANZUK ( to include Ireland and Norway) could be the best vehicle for that - not tying ourselves to the EU again.