Shots fired on defence spending
Plus: Labour lessons from Down Under, and the case for inequality
Better late than never. Some nine months after it was due, the Government’s Defence Investment Plan was published today – with £15 billion in extra military spending. That’s far less than our defence chiefs think they need (see our Stat of the Day, below), and even this figure will force PM-to-be Andy Burnham’s new chancellor to find another £4.7 billion in this autumn’s Budget. A charming leaving gift from Starmer to his successor.
The Amos review into the scandalous state of Britain’s maternity care was also released today, and the Government has already committed to implement its recommendation to create a maternity commissioner – something Theo Clarke advocated for in CapX back in January.
Astonishingly, the report also found that maternity wards did not always have senior doctors on duty at nights and weekends. There have been some 750 recommendations on how to fix maternity care since 2015. Let’s hope this set finally delivers.
Below you’ll find all the latest pieces from CapX, plus what we’re reading from around the web.
Marc Sidwell
Editor, CapX
Today’s Takes
Fresh thinking from CapX
What New Zealand and Australia can teach Burnham
Roger Partridge
‘The antipodean governments of the 1980s understood what British Labour has forgotten: a party of the people must be a party of growth.’
‘Growth cannot be ordered from the top down – it can only be nurtured from the bottom up,’ says Andy Burnham. He’s right. But if he means it, he should follow the example of two Labour parties who used the insight to unleash their economies: New Zealand and Australia in the 1980s. Read More
This Buy British plan is a recipe for trade war
Ben Ramanauskas
‘Andy Burnham can kiss goodbye to a closer relationship with the EU if he does this.’
It received less media attention than many of his more eye-catching announcements, but yesterday Andy Burnham stated that under his premiership, British firms would be favoured for government contracts. It would be a costly mistake: bad value for taxpayers, corrupting for the favoured firms and infuriating to some of our closest allies. Read More
Stat of the day
The CapX Reading List
The best of the web today
Starmer's swansong: the Defence Investment Plan
Lisa Haseldine, The Spectator
‘The DIP will raise the country’s core defence spending to just under 2.7% of GDP by 2030.’
The Defence Investment Plan (DIP), published today, is Keir Starmer’s swansong, and he presented it as a strategy built on tough choices over spending. There’s more money for drones, for the GCAP fighter and for the nuclear deterrent. Nevertheless, the plan does little more than paper over some substantial cracks. And it risks being squashed by the whims of his successor. Read More
In defence of inequality
James Sproule, The Telegraph 🔒
‘There is no better way of undermining sclerotic societies than offering opportunity to those who may lack social connections but have considerable ambition.’
Both the prime-minister-in-waiting and a frontrunner for chancellor recently made headlines attacking inequality. But entrepreneurial billionaires haven’t unfairly hoarded their wealth, and Britain hasn’t actually grown more unequal in recent years. The 1970s show where punitive taxation in the name of equality leads: a moribund economy, throttled ambition and a stultified social order. Read More
Learning the right lessons from Manchester
The Capitalist: Can the Tories dream again?
And if you want more...
– Why Britons really regret Brexit (Niall Ferguson)
– Nobody wins in a world of zero-sum politics (Law & Liberty)
– How to give drones a moral code (David Omand)
Can we make CapX better?
Or reply to this email to let us know your thoughts.
We'll be back tomorrow.







You highlight Niall Ferguson's piece " Why Britons Really Regret Brexit".
This piece suggests that this observation is now a "fact" when it is not. You will note Mia Bowater's comment that the nation's vote to leave was one of reclaiming British sovereignty.
Perhaps CapX could invite Prof. Ferguson to write a further piece distancing himself from his own 2017 position as stated in his Sunday Times article of 23 rd July 2017...I quote.....
" I was against Brexit a year ago, but subsequently came to the conclusion that it would be better for both the EU nations and the UK to get a divorce, for they want a federal Europe, and we NEVER did. Put less politely, they are prepared to put up with German predominance and we are not"
Comment please from CapX and Professor Ferguson.